Thursday, January 31, 2019

Jobless Claims … Chicago PMI … New Home Sales … Stock Market Analysis… ETF Trading … Dow 30 Ranking

JOBLESS CLAIMS (MarketWatch)
“The number of people who applied for jobless benefits in late January soared to a 16-month high of 253,000, but the spike stemmed mostly from seasonal quirks that occur around the holidays and are likely to fade soon.” Story at…
 
CHICAGO PMI (Advisor Perspectives)
“The latest Chicago Purchasing Manager's Index, or the Chicago Business Barometer, fell to 56.7 in January from a revised 63.8 in December…‘The MNI Chicago Business Barometer had a sluggish start to 2019, pressured by significant drops in both New Orders and Production, resulting in the lowest headline reading in two years,’ Jai Lakhani, Economist at MNI Indicators, said.’” Commentary and charts at…
 
NEW HOME SALES (MarketWatch)
“New-home sales ran at a seasonally adjusted annual 657,000 rate in November, the Commerce Department said Thursday. That was 17% higher than October’s sales pace and marked an 8-month high.” Story at…
 
CORRECTION UPDATE
This is day 90 of this correction (assuming we haven’t made a bottom yet – I count top to bottom).  As of today’s close, the Index is down 7.7% (19.8% max) from its prior high and has included 21 new-lows. In recent years only the 2011 correction contained 21 new-lows. That correction bottomed at 19.4% and took 108-days to complete, top to bottom.
 
Over the last 20-years (excluding major crashes and the current year) there have been 2 corrections that exceeded 19%, in 1998 and 2011. In 2011, the waterfall phase (nearly straight down with little or no bounces) took place over 3-weeks (about 15-trading sessions) and included a 17% drop with almost no relief. In 2018, the waterfall phase that ended Christmas Eve lasted 3-weeks over 15-trading sessions and included a drop of 16%.
 
MARKET REPORT / ANALYSIS         
-Thursday the S&P 500 rose about 0.9% to 2704.
-VIX fell about 6% to 16.57. 
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 2.637%.
 
While I have been calling for a retest of the 2351 low for what seems like forever, one must wonder whether this will be the one-in-20 event where there is no retest. Investors now seem to be in full “fear-of-missing-out, buy-buy-buy” mode. Indicators are bullish.
 
My daily sum of 17 Indicators remained +12 (a positive number is bullish; negatives are bearish) while the 10-day smoothed version that negates the daily fluctuations improved from +56 to +62.
 
Today, the S&P 500 remained above its upper downtrend line - that’s the line extending back to 3 Oct 2018 - and that should indicate a trend reversal, ie., “Everything is under control. Situation normal. Had a slight weapons malfunction. But uh, everything is perfectly alright now. We're fine. We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?" Well, since you asked, sometimes an investor must hold his/her nose and buy. Is this that time? I think not; at least not yet.
  
I said that the close at 2671 was probably a short-term top. We got slightly higher yesterday and higher still today. So much for being right – I haven’t been. We still need to see at least a small pullback based on the Statistically-Significant up-days we saw recently. The 50-year history of correction data that I presented in yesterday’s blog indicates that the bounce from the waterfall low can sometimes retrace the entire waterfall drop. Maybe that’s where we are headed now. That would take the Index back to 2790. That’s possible, but it is more likely that the Index will have a hard time breaking thru the 200-dMA, now at 2741. That’s less than 2% higher from where we are now.
 
Repeating what I’ve been saying for a while:
A “V”-bottom is very unusual and I don’t think it is likely that this correction will race to a top without a retest of the prior low at 2351. I sold the rally and cut my stock holdings back to about 30%, 9 January to reduce risk. Only a retest at the 2351 level, or a climb back above the old highs (not likely without a retest), will tell us whether 2351 was THE bottom.
 
MOMENTUM ANALYSIS:
(Momentum analysis is suspect in a selloff, so I‘d be careful using momentum data for the time being – the only reason utilities are highly ranked among ETFs is as an alternative to stocks during the correction.)  The same is true for individual stocks in the Dow 30.
TODAY’S RANKING OF  15 ETFs (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked ETF receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading ETF.  While momentum isn’t stock performance per se, momentum is closely related to stock performance. For example, over the 4-months from Oct thru mid-February 2016, the number 1 ranked Financials (XLF) outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20%. In 2017 Technology (XLK) was ranked in the top 3 Momentum Plays for 52% of all trading days in 2017 (if I counted correctly.) XLK was up 35% on the year while the S&P 500 was up 18%.
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
 
TODAY’S RANKING OF THE DOW 30 STOCKS (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked stock receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading stock.
*I rank the Dow 30 similarly to the ETF ranking system. For more details, see NTSM Page at…
 
THURSDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
Market Internals remained POSITIVE on the market.
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action but should not be used alone for short term trading. They are usually right, but they are often late.  They are most useful when they diverge from the Index.  In 2014, using these internals alone would have made a 9% return vs. 13% for the S&P 500 (in on Positive, out on Negative – no shorting). 
 
My current stock allocation is about 30% invested in stocks on as of 9 January 2019. For me, fully invested is a balanced 50% stock portfolio so this is a very conservative position.
 
INTERMEDIATE / LONG-TERM INDICATOR
Thursday, Volume and Price indicators were positive. The VIX and Sentiment indicators were neutral. Overall this is a BULLISH indication.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

FOMC (FED) Rate Decision … ADP employment … Crude Oil Inventories … Trucking Strong But Slowing … Oh NO – Global Cooling! … Stock Market Analysis… ETF Trading … Dow 30 Ranking

FED RATE DECISION (Reuters)
“The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady on Wednesday but said it would be patient in lifting borrowing costs further this year as it pointed to rising uncertainty about the U.S. economic outlook. While the Fed said continued U.S. economic and job growth were still “the most likely outcomes,” it removed language from its December policy statement that risks to the outlook were “roughly balanced” and struck language that projected “some further” rate hikes would be appropriate in 2019.” Story at…
My cmt: Markets rose on the announcement. The statement doesn’t add much to what Powel had said in a recent speech that calmed the markets, so I am a little surprised at the big reaction today.
 
ADP EMPOYMENT (MarketWatch)
“Companies in the U.S. added 213,000 jobs in January, ADP reported Wednesday, another strong reading that suggests little letdown in a steadily growing economy.” Story at…
 
CRUDE OIL INVENTORIES (OilPrice.com)
“As international prices inched up in the aftermath of Washington’s latest sanctions against Venezuela, the Energy Information Administration reported a build in crude oil inventories for the week to January 25. At 900,000 barrels, the build is modest, and follows an increase of 8 million barrels in the previous week.” Story at…
 
TRUCKING STRONG BUT SLOWING (ATA)
“American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index increased 6.6% in all of 2018 – the largest annual gain since 1998 (10.1%) and significantly better than the 3.8% increase in 2017. That annual gain was realized despite a decrease of 4.3% in December to 111.9, down from November’s level of 116.9. “The good news is that 2018 was a banner year for truck tonnage, witnessing the largest annual increase we’ve seen in two decades,” said ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello. “With that said, there is evidence that the industry and economy is moderating as tonnage fell a combined total of 5.6% in October and November after hitting an all-time high in October.” Press release at…
 
OH NO…GLOBAL COOLING! (TheNewAmerican)
“The climate alarmists just can’t catch a break. NASA is reporting that the sun is entering one of the deepest Solar Minima of the Space Age; and Earth’s atmosphere is responding in kind. “We see a cooling trend,” said Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold…” …The new NASA findings are in line with studies released by UC-San Diego and Northumbria University in Great Britain last year, both of which predict a Grand Solar Minimum in coming decades due to low sunspot activity. Both studies predicted sun activity similar to the Maunder Minimum of the mid-17th to early 18th centuries, which coincided to a time known as the Little Ice Age, during which temperatures were much lower than those of today.” Story at…
My cmt: Don’t cash in your IRAs! Perhaps Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s prediction that the world will end in 12 years due to global warming is a bit premature.
 
CORRECTION UPDATE
This is day 89 of this correction (assuming we haven’t made a bottom yet – I count top to bottom).  As of today’s close, the Index is down 8.5% (19.8% max) from its prior high and has included 21 new-lows. In recent years only the 2011 correction contained 21 new-lows. That correction bottomed at 19.4% and took 108-days to complete, top to bottom.
 
Over the last 20-years (excluding major crashes and the current year) there have been 2 corrections that exceeded 19%, in 1998 and 2011. In 2011, the waterfall phase (nearly straight down with little or no bounces) took place over 3-weeks (about 15-trading sessions) and included a 17% drop with almost no relief. In 2018, the waterfall phase that ended Christmas Eve lasted 3-weeks over 15-trading sessions and included a drop of 16%. Looking at a longer time period we see the following:
 
What happens when a correction’s waterfall decline exceeds 15%?
Chart by Bryce Coward, CFA from…
There were 19 instances since 1946 when the decline equaled or exceeded 15%. The ensuing bounce (col 3) averaged 12%. The entire waterfall decline was retraced a couple times during crash events. A recession occurred in every year except 1987,1998 and 2011. Note that the far-right column indicates that the low was retested every time.
 
MARKET REPORT / ANALYSIS         
-Wednesday the S&P 500 rose about 1.6% to 2681.
-VIX fell about 8% to 17.66. 
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 2.677%. (The Bond Ghouls may have some doubts about the rally.)
 
While I still think a retest down to the 2351 low is likely, there are signs that the S&P 500 wants to go higher, especially since it has pushed above the 50-dMA.  It will be hard to sit back and watch if it does climb steadily.  The “fear-of-missing-out” syndrome will be in full force.
 
My daily sum of 17 Indicators improved from +8 to +12 (a positive number is bullish; negatives are bearish) while the 10-day smoothed version that negates the daily fluctuations improved from +50 to +56. Here’s a run down of some of the stronger signals.
 
BULLISH SIGNS
-There have been a number of closes above 50-dMA since 17 January.
-As of today, the Index is now slightly above its upper downtrend line extending back to 3 Oct 2018. A trend break is generally indicated by 2 consecutive closes above the old trend or a close 3% higher than the old trendline. We’ll have to see if the Index can close higher tomorrow.
-Up-volume is picking up.
-Size of the up-moves have been larger than the down moves over the last month.
-Late day action (the Smart Money) is headed up.
-New-high/new-low data is looking better and is bullish.
 
NEUTRAL SIGNS
-VIX is neutral.
-Bollinger Bands and RSI are not giving a signal.
-Money Trend is turning up. This is neutral at this point, because it is a high number that may not be sustainable.
-The Utilities ETF (XLU) vs. the S&P 500 is neutral.
 
BEAR SIGNS
-Breadth (measured as the % of NYSE stocks advancing over the past 10-days) is 60.4%. This is a very extreme number and as a result, the overbought/oversold ratio remains overbought.
  
We said that the close at 2671 was probably a short-term top. We got slightly higher today, but it was another Statistically-Significant up-day as was the 2671 high. That means that the price-volume move exceeded my statistical parameters.  Stats show that a down-day occurs in the next trading session about 60% of the time. Statistically-significant, up-days can indicate a top, so today’s move probably indicates another short-term top. I need to see some more bullishness before I conceded the bear is dead.
 
Repeating what I’ve been saying for a while:
A “V”-bottom is very unusual and I don’t think it is likely that this correction will race to a top without a retest of the prior low at 2351. I sold the rally and cut my stock holdings back to about 30%, 9 January to reduce risk. Only a retest at the 2351 level, or a climb back above the old highs (not likely without a retest), will tell us whether 2351 was THE bottom.
 
MOMENTUM ANALYSIS:
(Momentum analysis is suspect in a selloff, so I‘d be careful using momentum data for the time being – the only reason utilities are highly ranked among ETFs is as an alternative to stocks during the correction.)  The same is true for individual stocks in the Dow 30.
TODAY’S RANKING OF  15 ETFs (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked ETF receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading ETF.  While momentum isn’t stock performance per se, momentum is closely related to stock performance. For example, over the 4-months from Oct thru mid-February 2016, the number 1 ranked Financials (XLF) outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20%. In 2017 Technology (XLK) was ranked in the top 3 Momentum Plays for 52% of all trading days in 2017 (if I counted correctly.) XLK was up 35% on the year while the S&P 500 was up 18%.
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
 
TODAY’S RANKING OF THE DOW 30 STOCKS (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked stock receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading stock.
*I rank the Dow 30 similarly to the ETF ranking system. For more details, see NTSM Page at…
 
WEDNESDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
Market Internals remained POSITIVE on the market.
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action but should not be used alone for short term trading. They are usually right, but they are often late.  They are most useful when they diverge from the Index.  In 2014, using these internals alone would have made a 9% return vs. 13% for the S&P 500 (in on Positive, out on Negative – no shorting). 
 
My current stock allocation is about 30% invested in stocks on as of 9 January 2019. For me, fully invested is a balanced 50% stock portfolio so this is a very conservative position.
 
INTERMEDIATE / LONG-TERM INDICATOR
Wednesday, Volume and Price indicators were positive. The VIX and Sentiment indicators were neutral. Overall this is a BULLISH indication.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Consumer Confidence … FED Regional Manufacturing … Mueller Probe Nearly Done … Retest of Correction Lows Likely … Stock Market Analysis… ETF Trading … Dow 30 Ranking

CONSUMER CONFIDENCE (MarketWatch)
“The 35-day partial government shutdown helped triggered a sharp drop in consumer confidence in January and signaled growing worries about the future, a fresh survey shows, though optimism has typically rebounded after similar episodes in the past. The consumer confidence index fell to 120.2 in this month from 126.6 in December, the privately run Conference Board said Tuesday.” Story at…
My cmt: Consumer confidence tends to follow the stock market, but not this time.  The market made a strong rebound – not so for the Consumer Confidence reading.
 
FED REGIONAL MANUFACTURING (Advisor Perspectives)
“Regional manufacturing surveys are a measure of local economic health and are used as a representative for the larger national manufacturing health. They have been used as a signal for business uncertainty and economic activity as a whole. Manufacturing makes up 12% of the country's GDP.” – Jill Mislinsky.
Chart and commentary at…
My cmt: The article points out that the ISM Manufacturing surveys are also falling sharply. None are screaming “recession,” but it is disconcerting to note that important measures of economic activity are falling sharply. As we noted previously, Leading economic Indicators are falling too. See “LEI” at…
This is the kind of news that tends to support my belief that a retest of the Christmas Eve lows (S&P 500 - 2351) are more likely than not. If that weren’t enough…
 
MUELLER PROBE NEARLY DONE (ZeroHedge)
“A visibly sweating acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker said late on Monday that he was briefed on special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and that it is "close to being completed", the first public indication by the government that the probe is drawing to a close.” Story at…
My cmt: I think that it is clear that President Trump paid off Stormy Daniels (the porn star) to keep her quiet during his Presidential campaign. While paying off one’s mistress doesn’t seem to be grounds for impeachment, it apparently is a violation of campaign finance rules/laws. The problem is that President Trump has repeatedly denied being aware of the payoff and I suspect he has answered written questions to that effect under oath. With witnesses likely to testify otherwise, it seems likely that Trump has committed perjury in his written answers to Mueller.  The case is much like the perjury committed by President Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky affair.  Ken Starr was initially appointed to investigate Clinton real estate deals (Whitewater) and the suicide of Vince Foster. The wide-ranging investigation uncovered other more sordid dealings. Trump has similar problems. He may be impeached – whether he’ll be removed remains to be seen. More to the point for this blog, the stock market won’t like it.
 
The current odds for impeachment are even money at PredictIt.org at…
 
TECHNICALLY SPEAKING EXCERPT – RETEST IS LIKELY (Real Investment Advice)
“…this rally has already retraced 65% of the waterfall decline (greater than average and median) and has lasted about three weeks (less than average but greater than median). This suggests upside from here may be limited in both magnitude and duration. Furthermore, these data strongly suggest the major index will retest the Christmas Eve low at the very least and most likely will make a new lower low in the weeks and months ahead…this could certainly work out much like 2015-2016 if the Fed throws in the towel to appease the markets. If they don’t, there are plenty of indications which suggest a more important mean reversion process has already begun.” Commentary at…
My cmt: This article included a chart that showed 19 corrections/crashes were the waterfall phase of the correction included a drop of 15% or greater. The waterfall-low was tested in every one of those instances.   
 
CORRECTION UPDATE
This is day 88 of this correction (assuming we haven’t made a bottom yet).  As of today’s close, the Index is down 9.9% (19.8% max) from its prior high and has included 21 new-lows. In recent years only the 2011 correction contained 21 new-lows. That correction bottomed at 19.4% and took 108-days to complete, top to bottom.
 
Over the last 20-years (excluding major crashes and the current year) there have been 2 corrections that exceeded 19%, in 1998 and 2011. In 2011, the waterfall phase (nearly straight down with little or no bounces) took place over 3-weeks (about 15-trading sessions) and included a 17% drop with almost no relief. In 2018, the waterfall phase that ended Christmas Eve lasted 3-weeks over 15-trading sessions and included a drop of 16%.
 
MARKET REPORT / ANALYSIS         
-Tuesday the S&P 500 dropped about 0.2% to 2640.
-VIX rose about 1% to 19.13. 
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 2.712%.
 
Forecast Bias takes several forms. If your investment group is bullish, you are likely to be bullish. (Read the book “Blink.” It has a very good discussion of research that proves this type of bias.)  You are likely to be bullish if you have a lot of money invested in stocks, even as the evidence begins to turn against you. I try to remain neutral in my assessments, but it isn’t easy to keep an even keel when divining the tea leaves.  Just look at the data now. There are 3 camps.
 
(1) Bullish analysts cite the Breadth Thrust I mentioned yesterday as the reason we won’t see a retest of the prior low. They are bullish.
 
(2) Neutral. Those like me are waiting for more evidence and cite the long correction-history where almost all corrections greater than 10% include a retest of the low made at the end of the waterfall phase of the correction – in this case, Christmas eve. We can also mention the poor recovery of new-high data and weak advancing-volume over.
 
(3) Super bears are calling for a 50%+ crash. A super bear can point to new-lows greater than 1000 for three days running (21-24 December). The only time we’ve seen even 2 consecutive days with new-lows this high in the last 10 years was during the Financial Crisis and crash in 2008-2009. This time we had 3! There’s also plenty of worry and bad news to feed the Bears.
 
Which will it be? I am in the Middle of the Road Camp, expecting a retrace to the prior low, but I’m afraid we’ll have to wait and see.
  
We said that the close at 2671 was probably a short-term top. Based on the evidence so far, we haven’t seen anything to change that view.
 
My Money Trend indicator is still headed down and that’s a bearish sign, but its rate of decline slowed considerably recently.
 
My daily sum of 17 Indicators improved from +4 to +8 (a positive number is bullish; negatives are bearish) while the 10-day smoothed version that negates the daily fluctuations improved from +49 to +50. This is looking much more bullish today.  We’ll have to see if the trend continues.
 
Today was an odd day. We saw advancers outpace decliners (56% of NYSE stocks advanced); up volume exceeded down volume with 58% up-volume; and new-highs exceeded new-lows. In spite of those impressive numbers, except for the Dow, the major indexes were down. I won’t even try to explain that.
 
Repeating what I’ve been saying for a while:
A “V”-bottom is very unusual and I don’t think it is likely that this correction will race to a top without a retest of the prior low at 2351. I sold the rally and cut my stock holdings back to about 30%, 9 January to reduce risk. Only a retest at the 2351 level, or a climb back above the old highs (not likely without a retest), will tell us whether 2351 was THE bottom.
 
MOMENTUM ANALYSIS:
(Momentum analysis is suspect in a selloff, so I‘d be careful using momentum data for the time being – the only reason utilities are highly ranked among ETFs is as an alternative to stocks during the correction.)  The same is true for individual stocks in the Dow 30.
TODAY’S RANKING OF  15 ETFs (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked ETF receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading ETF.  While momentum isn’t stock performance per se, momentum is closely related to stock performance. For example, over the 4-months from Oct thru mid-February 2016, the number 1 ranked Financials (XLF) outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20%. In 2017 Technology (XLK) was ranked in the top 3 Momentum Plays for 52% of all trading days in 2017 (if I counted correctly.) XLK was up 35% on the year while the S&P 500 was up 18%.
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
 
TODAY’S RANKING OF THE DOW 30 STOCKS (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked stock receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading stock.
*I rank the Dow 30 similarly to the ETF ranking system. For more details, see NTSM Page at…
 
TUESDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
Market Internals switched to POSITIVE on the market.
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action but should not be used alone for short term trading. They are usually right, but they are often late.  They are most useful when they diverge from the Index.  In 2014, using these internals alone would have made a 9% return vs. 13% for the S&P 500 (in on Positive, out on Negative – no shorting). 
 
My current stock allocation is about 30% invested in stocks on as of 9 January 2019. For me, fully invested is a balanced 50% stock portfolio so this is a very conservative position.
 
INTERMEDIATE / LONG-TERM INDICATOR
Tuesday, The VIX, Volume, Sentiment and Price indicators were neutral. Overall this is a NEUTRAL indication.

Monday, January 28, 2019

Caterpillar Down 9% - Blames China … Earnings ... Stock Market Analysis… ETF Trading … Dow 30 Ranking

CATERPILLAR DOWN 9% - BLAMES CHINA (Yahoo Finance)
“…global bellwether Caterpillar (CATreported disappointing results for the final quarter of 2018 and provided a weak earnings outlook for 2019. The heavy-equipment giant cited lower demand in China as a factor impacting performance, providing the latest sign of the corporate impact of the country’s slowing economy.” Story at…
My cmt: Intel was punished and now Caterpillar. Both blamed the Chinese economy. The U.S. markets will worry about “Asian Contagion.” A U.S. GDP slowdown is already predicted. Ataman Ozyildirim, Director of Economic Research at The Conference Board said last week, "While the effects of the government shutdown are not yet reflected here, the LEI suggests that the economy could decelerate towards 2 percent growth by the end of 2019." The key-word here is “decelerate”.
 
EARNINGS (FactSet)
“To date, 22% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported actual results for Q4 2018. In terms of earnings, the percentage of companies reporting actual EPS above estimates (71%) is equal to the five-year average. In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 3.0% above the estimates, which is below the five-year average. In terms of revenues, the percentage of companies reporting actual revenues above estimates (59%) is below the five-year average. In aggregate, companies are reporting revenues that are 0.2% above the estimates, which is also below the five-year average.” From FactSet at…
My cmt: Both earnings and revenues are reporting below the 5-year averages.
 
CORRECTION UPDATE
This is day 87 of this correction (assuming we haven’t made a bottom yet).  As of today’s close, the Index is down 9.8% (19.8% max) from its prior high and has included 21 new-lows. In recent years only the 2011 correction contained 21 new-lows. That correction bottomed at 19.4% and took 108-days to complete, top to bottom.
 
Over the last 20-years (excluding major crashes and the current year) there have been 2 corrections that exceeded 19%, in 1998 and 2011. In 2011, the waterfall phase (nearly straight down with little or no bounces) took place over 3-weeks (about 15-trading sessions) and included a 17% drop with almost no relief. In 2018, the waterfall phase that ended Christmas Eve lasted 3-weeks over 15-trading sessions and included a drop of 16%.
 
MARKET REPORT / ANALYSIS         
-Monday the S&P 500 dropped about 0.8% to 2644.
-VIX rose about 8% to 18.87. 
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 2.749%.
 
Some have suggested that the Markets will not retest the prior lows.  Among the most compelling argument is the advance-decline line went from oversold to overbought in record time.  My numbers show it took 4-trading sessions. (That’s so fast I want to check the numbers again!) That is referred to as a Breadth-Thrust and it shows a fairly broad rebound since the numbers of stocks on the NYSE that advanced over the period is reasonably high; over the last month more than 60% of stocks on the NYSE have advanced. All is not rosy though.
 
There don’t seem to be enough new-highs to confirm the end of a correction.  A month after the low on 28 December, we still haven’t managed to print more than 50-new-highs even on the most bullish day. During the 2011, 19%-correction, we saw new-highs hit 171 in the same amount of time. That correction included a retest of the low. This time, new-highs have been slower to develop.
 
If we look at the Jan 2018, 10%-correction, new-highs recovered at a very fast pace and there was no retest of the low.  The slope of the curve was steep. This time, the slope of the new-high curve is much flatter.
 
I’ve looked at the data going back 4 years. “Correction over” signals developed when new-highs were rising at a much faster pace than we see now. This data seems to suggest that we will see a retest of the prior lows, but we can’t infer anything more than that. We still don’t know if this is “The Big One”. I don’t think it is, but that is just a guess based mostly on the hope that economists are right when they say we aren’t going into recession anytime soon.
 
We said that the close at 2671 was probably a short-term top. Based on the evidence so far, we haven’t seen anything to change that view.
 
My Money Trend indicator is still headed down and that’s a bearish sign. (This indicator attempts to follow the general concept of Lowry Research and their supply and demand methodology for stock market analysis. Their concept is based on a detailed stock-by-stock analysis while mine is an estimate based on readily available Macro data.  Theirs is much more accurate, but that doesn’t mean mine isn’t useful.)
 
My daily sum of 17 Indicators improved from +3 to +5 (a positive number is bullish; negatives are bearish) while the 10-day smoothed version that negates the daily fluctuations declined from +57 to +50. I tend to watch the 10-day direction of this indicator and for now it is headed down, a bearish sign.
 
Repeating what I’ve been saying for a while:
A “V”-bottom is very unusual and I don’t think it is likely that this correction will race to a top without a retest of the prior low at 2351. I sold the rally and cut my stock holdings back to about 30%, 9 January to reduce risk. Only a retest at the 2351 level, or a climb back above the old highs (not likely without a retest), will tell us whether 2351 was THE bottom.
 
MOMENTUM ANALYSIS:
(Momentum analysis is suspect in a selloff, so I‘d be careful using momentum data for the time being – the only reason utilities are highly ranked among ETFs is as an alternative to stocks during the correction.)  The same is true for individual stocks in the Dow 30.
TODAY’S RANKING OF  15 ETFs (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked ETF receives 100%. (In this case -100% since all are negative.) The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading ETF.  While momentum isn’t stock performance per se, momentum is closely related to stock performance. For example, over the 4-months from Oct thru mid-February 2016, the number 1 ranked Financials (XLF) outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20%. In 2017 Technology (XLK) was ranked in the top 3 Momentum Plays for 52% of all trading days in 2017 (if I counted correctly.) XLK was up 35% on the year while the S&P 500 was up 18%.
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
 
TODAY’S RANKING OF THE DOW 30 STOCKS (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked stock receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading stock.
*I rank the Dow 30 similarly to the ETF ranking system. For more details, see NTSM Page at…
 
MONDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
Market Internals remained NEUTRAL on the market.
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action but should not be used alone for short term trading. They are usually right, but they are often late.  They are most useful when they diverge from the Index.  In 2014, using these internals alone would have made a 9% return vs. 13% for the S&P 500 (in on Positive, out on Negative – no shorting). 
 
My current stock allocation is about 30% invested in stocks on as of 9 January 2019. For me, fully invested is a balanced 50% stock portfolio so this is a very conservative position.
 
INTERMEDIATE / LONG-TERM INDICATOR
Monday, only the Sentiment indicator was positive; The Volume, VIX and Price indicators were neutral. Overall this is a NEUTRAL indication. The longer/intermediate-term version of Sentiment is neutral.