It was a busy day so today’s post is later than usual.
"This is maybe the most dangerous market of my career, and that includes 1987's crash, that includes the savings and loan debacle market of the early '90s, that includes the 1999 to 2009 lost decade in the S&P 500 in the dot-com bubble. This is the most difficult market of my 45 years." - Bill Smead, Smead Value Fund (SMVLX), May 2025.”
“The New York Times is always entertaining when it grapples, or fails to grapple, with climate change, the scale of which simply eludes it.
It says of Donald Trump, “The president’s embrace of fossil fuels . . . will make it hard to keep warming at safe levels.” The reality: U.S. election outcomes are completely invisible in the climate data. Even very large events, such as Covid or the collapse of Soviet industry, at most leave a noticeable indent only on the varying annual rate of emissions increase, not overall atmospheric CO2.
…Meanwhile, Mr. Trump at least can hope to be a climate footnote in place of the enlarged role the Times tries to assign him. Ironically, he will share the footnote with his most frothing Democratic critic, Illinois Gov. Jay Pritzker: Both men have been working lately to advance carbon-free nuclear.” – Holman Jenkins, Jr., editorial board of The Wall Street Journal. Commentary at…
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump-the-climate-nonentity-09e59dff
“Karl Rove makes a persuasive case that many of the standard measures used to judge a year—economic growth, employment, inflation, crime—don’t justify the level of public unease (“The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of 2025,” op-ed, Dec. 30). Yet something else lies at the center of that discontent.
Trust erodes when governance appears transactional rather than principled. When pardons, tax policy and access to power seem tied to loyalty or financial benefit, citizens begin to doubt individual decisions and the fairness of the system itself. No amount of messaging will resolve that; only honesty and transparency can.” - Lori Devlin
“Donald Trump has vowed to "100%" follow through on his threat to impose tariffs on European countries who oppose his demand to take control of Greenland. European allies have rallied around Greenland's sovereignty. Denmark's foreign minister emphasised [sic] the US president cannot threaten his way to ownership of the semi-autonomous Danish territory.” Story at…
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g5345ylk0o
My cmt: This is an act of war. Trump should be impeached.
“Denmark dispatched additional troops to Greenland on Monday as President Trump added a new dimension to his pursuit of the Danish island, telling Norway that he no longer needed to think “purely of peace” after not winning the Nobel Peace Prize.” Story at…
https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/trump-links-greenland-threats-to-missing-out-on-nobel-prize-3076eecc?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqcUF1tKWuEwCaz2sAu0dmpJvWxDc0KJPSBban8xx4PxpR0DeZaFItEPkQn9x-c%3D&gaa_ts=696fd214&gaa_sig=D4QN5Z-vh3xpQe1XO6XQAjSCKSrFwidFSZipOi9YqsdKD3dA5MJIcaNdcYPYmS7nHdfdTL1DCHX6IvaYdw7dlw%3D%3D’
My cmt: This is an act of insanity. Trump should be institutionalized.
-Tuesday the S&P 500 declined about 2.1% to 6797.
-VIX rose about 27% to 20.09.
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.287% (compared to about this time prior market day).
XLK – Added 11/26/2025 & 12/1/2025
SPY – Added 12/1/2025.
NVDA – Added a small position 12/1/2025.
SSO – Added 1/7/2026.
At the close today, of the 50-Indicators I track, 8 gave Bear-signs and 12 were Bullish. The rest are neutral. (It is normal to have a lot of neutral indicators since many of the indicators are top or bottom indicators that will signal only at extremes.)
On Friday there were only 2 bear signs, but they were significant: (1) There was a bearish crossover in MACD. (2) The other was that 100% of the ETF’s I track are now above their 120-dMAs. That often indicates a top, although the indicator is not a timely signal, nor does it tell us if it is an important top.
-Tuesday was a statistically significant down-day. That just means that the price-volume move exceeded my statistical parameters. Statistics show that a statistically-significant, down-day is followed by an up-day about 60% of the time.
-Bollinger Bands are oversold.
-Today’s large move down triggered my Panic indicator. At tops, this is a bearish indicator; at bottoms, it is bullish. What is it now? Hard to say, but for now I’ll call it bullish. If the markets continue lower then I’ll have to change my view.
The S&P 500 is close to its lower trendline and the 100-dMA. I think markets go up from here. I’m cautiously bullish and fully invested, but I’ll be watching the markets closely. Futures are higher as I write this – let’s hope it stays that way.
TODAY’S RANKING OF 15 ETFs (Ranked Daily) ETF ranking follows:
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
http://navigatethestockmarket.blogspot.com/p/exchange-traded-funds-etf-ranking.html
For more details, see NTSM Page at…
https://navigatethestockmarket.blogspot.com/p/a-system-for-trading-dow-30-stocks-my_8.html
TUESDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
My basket of Market Internals declined to HOLD. (My basket of Market Internals is a decent trend-following analysis that is most useful when it diverges from the Index.)
I trade about 15-20% of the total portfolio using the momentum-based analysis I provide here although I don’t trade as much as I used to. When I see bullish signs, I add a lot more stocks to the portfolio, usually by using an S&P 500 ETF as I did back in October 2022 and 2023.