Tuesday, January 7, 2014

2014 A Good Year?

2014 ECONOMIC FORECAST (New Deal Democrat)
“…unless we expect deflation (and right now I don't), there is every reason to view the long leading indicators, under either method, as being in agreement that the economic expansion will continue through the end of 2014.
On the other hand, the deceleration of most of the indicators, and also the deceleration of the WLI, cause me to believe that the second half will be considerably weaker than the first half. If the long leading indicators turn negative quickly enough and significantly enough, it is possible that we could enter into a recession in Q4. Before ruling that out, I want to see how 2013 Q4 corporate profits play out, as well as the next couple of months of housing and money supply data. But subject to that caveat – that there are mounting reasons to be concerned about 2015 – I look for continued positive readings in employment, wages, industrial production, and GDP through the year.” Lengthy analysis with numerous charts and thoughtful analysis at Advisor Perspectives (dShort.com) at…
http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/NDD-140106-2014-Forecast.php

MORE FROM JOHN HUSSMAN, PhD (Hussman Funds)
“We observe warnings from nearly every variant of overvalued, overbought, overbullish, rising-yield conditions that have accurately warned investors of oncoming market losses in a century of data, not to mention in real-time in 2000 and 2007…
…As one of many historically effective variants of this syndrome, define “overvalued” as a Shiller P/E anything higher than 18 (given an actual multiple of 25.7 here, any objections to the Shiller metric are quibbles); define “overbought” as the S&P 500 at least 8% over its 200-day average, and just to be extreme about it – within 2% of a 5-year high; define “overbullish” as a 2-week average of bulls greater than 54% with bears less than half that level – below 27%; define rising yields as a 10-year Treasury yield higher than it was 6 months earlier.”
 
“Prior to 2013, those conditions were observed only in June 2007 – about 2% from a bull market peak that would be followed by a 55% market loss; July 1999 – when optimistic investors could at least look for the S&P 500 to advance another 8% to the ultimate bull market peak in 2000, after which the market lost half its value – but not without a 12% correction between July and October 1999 first; the August 1987 pre-crash peak; the December 1972 peak, a few weeks before the New York Times quoted then-analyst Alan Greenspan saying “It’s very rare that you can be as unqualifiedly bullish as you can now” – immediately followed by a 50% market plunge; and (using imputed sentiment data) August 1929.” .” – John Hussman, PhD, Hussman Funds Weekly Market Commentary for 6 January 2014.  Full commentary at…

One wonders how much longer the FED can keep propping up the markets.  The FED gets the credit for near record stock market returns in 2013.  The FED has vowed to support the economy to the fullest and will even reverse tapering of QE if necessary.  On the other hand, I doubt that even the FED could prop up the markets forever unless the economy begins to improve at a faster rate.

TREASURIES HIT 3% - THE END OF THE STOCK RALLY? (Michael Lombardi)
This was a quick but insightful read.  Here’s the conclusion:
“Going into 2014…I am worried about key stock indices like the S&P 500. The easy money policies of the Federal Reserve have been largely responsible for 2013's rally in the key stock indices. But inadvertently, the Fed has created a new stock market bubble with its ridiculous, long-running money printing programs. Dear reader, the higher key stock indices go, the bigger the fall is going to be and the bigger the damage will be to consumer confidence and spending.” – Michael Lombardi.  Full commentary and analysis posted at Advisor Perspectives, dShort.com at…

NTSM PERFORMANCE UPDATE
I’ve updated the performance page on the right of the NTSM Blog under Pages, titled “Performance of the Navigate the Stock Market System” thru 2013.    

MARKET REPORT
Tuesday, the S&P 500 was up 0.6% to 1838 (rounded). 
VIX was down about 5% to 12.92. 

The 10-year Treasury Note closed at 2.94% yield. As explained by Art Cashin, UBS Director of Floor Trading on the NYSE and CNBC commentator, rates at 3% or above are considered by some traders to be “trouble-for-stocks”.
 
MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
The 10-day moving average of stocks advancing was 57% at the close Tuesday.  (A number above 50% for the 10-day average is generally good news for the market.)   New-highs outpaced new-lows Tuesday, leaving the spread (new-hi minus new-low) at +125 (it was +105 Monday).  The 10-day moving average of change in the spread fell to minus 12. In other words, over the last 10-days, on average, the spread has decreased by12 each day.  Market internals remained NEUTRAL on the market. 

Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action, but in 2013, if I had been buying the positive ratings and selling negative ratings I would have under-performed a buy-and-hold strategy.
 
NTSM
The S&P 500 was 10.1% above the 200-dMA at the close Tuesday a week ago and a value of 10% has led to small pullbacks in 2013 (and corrections in 2011 and 2012).  That stat was 9.1% above the 200-dMA Tuesday (today).  The Index is 2.4% above the 50-dMA. 
I expect the markets to pullback in the first quarter of 2014, but it remains to be seen whether it will be another small buy-the-dip event or something more. 
 
My New Year’s resolution was to stop trying to predict short term moves in the markets…That lasted one-day!
 
The most recent BUY signal for the NTSM system was 25 October.  The “5-10-20 Timer” switched to BUY from HOLD on 18 December.
THE NTSM ANALYSIS IS HOLD. 

MY INVESTED POSITION
I am about 30% invested in stocks as of 20 December (S&P 500-1540) because I upped my stock holdings by 10% on the 20th of December.  Unless I get a SELL signal in the NTSM system, I will continue to income-average (a little each month) into the stocks to get my %-invested up to around 50% (max for me now) unless there is a correction that would allow me to move in sooner and at a higher percentage. Since that is my expectation, I have not upped my invested percentage in one move as I normally would.
(A good rule of thumb for percent invested is to subtract your age from 100 and put that amount into the stock market.  Generally a minimum of 50%-50% stocks and other investment is a reasonable value for the over 50-crowd; that’s my group.  With bond yields rising keep to the short end of bonds, i.e., less than 10-year maturity or mutual funds that focus on the short end.