Wednesday, December 11, 2013

QE Taper – Three Steps and a Stumble…Q-Ratio: Valuations Are High

Yesterday, I referred to the indicator that says that 3-tightenings by the Federal Reserve can lead to stock market declines.  That is the “Three Steps and a Stumble” rule.

THREE STEPS AND A STUMBLE (Financial Dictionary)
“A rule of thumb stating that the prices of stocks fall significantly after the Federal Reserve raises interest rates three times in a row. In a booming economy, minor adjustments in key interest rates, both up and down, are fairly normal. However, if the Fed raises interest rates three times in a row, this is taken as an indicator that it intends for interest rates to remain at a comparatively high level for the foreseeable future. This leads investors to sell stock, because the businesses underlying the stock now have the added cost of high interest rates, which reduces profits. The selling of stock causes stock prices to drop.” Definition from…
http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Three+Steps+and+Stumble+Rule

The 3-steps and a stumble rule was developed by Edson Gould who was a true stock market Guru in his day and an expert in market timing.  In a November1976 interview with Louis Rukeyser on “Wall Street Week” Gould described his market timing system as follows: “[T]here are three factors that determine…the level of the stock market and the trend thereof. You can list them as economic, monetary [Fed action] and what I call psychological [valuation/sentiment]. Now, the monetary factors are always early, but they’re very important. They give you the early warning of a change. The economic factors are always late….And the so-called psychological factors that I use, they’re concurrent.”  His biography and description of his timing model can be found at…
http://knowledgebase.mta.org/?fuseaction=kb.resource&kbResourceID=13F1448F-AD6A-93F9-09E38B20030C01B4

VALUATION & THE Q-RATIO
Zerohedge had a commentary regarding Q-Ratio titled, “Are Stocks Cheap?”  Quoting ZeroHedge: “Absent the "obvious" bubble in the late 90s, the US equity market is at its most expensive valuation since right before the '30s crashStill want to BTFATH [buy-the-f’g-all-time-high]? Afraid of missing out?” For the article see Zerohedge at…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-11/are-stocks-cheap

The best analysis of the Q-ratio that I have seen is by Doug Short.  Doug posted recently: “Based on the latest Z.1 data, the Q Ratio at the end of the second quarter was 0.93…My latest estimate would put the ratio about 53% above its arithmetic mean and 59% above its geometric mean. Of course periods of over- and under-valuation can last for many years at a time, so the Q Ratio is not a useful indicator for short-term investment timelines. This metric is more appropriate for formulating expectations for long-term market performance.… the current level is close to the vicinity of market tops, with Tech Bubble peak as an extreme outlier.”  For a full discussion of Q-Ratio with historical analysis and charts, see…

Speaking of sentiment…

“The ratio of bulls to bears has never (that is ever) been higher according to…Investor's Intelligence.” Chart brief story at…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-11/peak-greater-fools

CORRECTION
There have been several technical indicators that suggest a limited correction:
1.    %-above the 200-dMA peaked at 9.8% 3-weeks ago and was 9% 2-days ago.
2.    Sentiment  and %-above the 200-day moving average taken together indicates a correction as of 2-weeks ago
3.    Statistical analysis of price volume action shows a typical “calm-before-the-storm price/volume action for the last 3-days.
4.    The market is at the top trend line as of 2-days ago.
5.    Sentiment is extreme high.
6.    VIX was at a level where corrections have started about 3-weeks ago.
7.    There has been late-day selling over 1-week, 2-week, and 1-month periods.

VIX will need to continue rising to confirm a correction.  There is no panic either that would suggest a “real” correction.  With the Holiday coming, any correction that might occur would probably be put on hold until January. 

“Over the past 10 years, the S&P 500 (SPY) has closed higher than it opened in the month of December 78% of the time.”  (from The Traders Journal at
http://blogs.stockcharts.com/journal/2013/12/some-seasonal-goodies-for-you-to-unwrap.html)

DO BULL MARKETS DIE IN DECEMBER? (MarketWatch)
Here’s today’s cheerful factoid: No bull market of the last five decades has come to an end in December.

Unfortunately, a longer term perspective paints a less happy picture: The number of bull markets that die in December actually is not statistically different than average.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/do-bull-markets-ever-die-in-december-2013-12-11

MARKET REPORT
Wednesday, the S&P was down 1.1% to 1782 (rounded).
VIX rose 11% to 15.49. 

MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
The 10-day moving average of stocks advancing fell to 44% at the close Wednesday.  (A number below 50% for the 10-day average is generally bad news for the market.) 

New-lows outpaced new-highs Wednesday, leaving the spread (new-hi minus new-low) at minus 117 (it was plus 26 Tuesday).  The 10-day moving average of change in the spread fell to minus 30.  In other words, over the last 10-days, on average, the spread has decreased by 30 each day.

Market internals remain negative on the market.


 

 
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action, but in 2013 (so far), if I had been buying the positive ratings and selling negative ratings I would have under-performed a buy-and-hold strategy.


 

I need a pullback to get back in.  Otherwise I will continue to sit out the party. 

MY INVESTED POSITION (NO CHANGE)
I remain about 20% invested in stocks as of 5 March (S&P 500 -1540).  The NTSM system sold at 1575 on 16 April.  (This is just another reminder that I should follow the NTSM analysis and not act emotionally – I am now under-performing my own system by about 6%!)  I have no problems leaving 20% or 30% invested.  If the market is cut in half (worst case) I’d only lose 10%-15% of my investments.  It also hedges the bet if I am wrong since I will have some invested if the market goes up.  No system is perfect.

I still lean toward getting back in, after a pullback, to speculate on a final ride to the top.  NTSM did give several buy signals over the weeks of 14 and 21 Oct, but the market has looked too frothy to rush back in…we’ll see if the market will pullback so I can join the insanity.  If not, cash is (grit my teeth and put on a false smile) fine.