Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Great Caesar’s Ghost – Jack Bogle predicts 2-Crashes?

JACK BOGLE (Business Insider)
“Scott Wapner, CNBC anchor, asked, "You say, 'prepare for at least two declines of 25-30 percent, maybe even 50 percent, in the coming decade.' For a buy-and-hold guy, that's a little concerning, don't you think?" Bogle replied:  “Not at all. They come and go. The market goes up, and the market goes down. It's never failed to recover from one of those 50 percent declines.”  Jack Bogle is the former head of Vanguard Mutual Funds and a well-known, buy-and-hold investor.  Full story at... http://www.businessinsider.com/jack-bogle-warns-of-two-50-percent-market-declines-in-next-10-years-2013-4#ixzz2PJEeNdWD

Here’s a Bullish point of view... 

S&P RALLY HAS ANOTHER 100 POINTS TO GO (Daryl Guppy - CNBC)
“The market has developed a small consolidation near 1,550. This is a very strong bullish feature. This consolidation may be followed by a rapid breakout above this resistance level and 1,550. This rally breakout would confirm a very strong uptrend. The upside target for this type of breakout is near 1,690. This target is calculated by projecting the width of the trading bands above 1,550... There is a high probability this uptrend will continue to 1,690.  Full story at...
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100607744

CORRECTION TIMING (WSJ.com)
“The S&P 500 has gone 91 trading days without a pullback of at least 5%, a streak that dates back to President Barack Obama’s reelection in mid-November. It is the second-longest stretch during the current four-year bull market without such a decline, according to Stone & McCarthy Research Associates.  The current run has prompted two schools of thought: One says the market is long overdue for at least a temporary pullback. The other says this rally is relatively in-line with previous trends.”  Full story at...
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2013/04/02/morning-marketbeat-correction-timing-triggers-debate/?mod=yahoo_hs

The market will either correct or not?  Now there’s a risky forecast – half right, no matter what.  Back in 2006 and 2007 (before the decline) 90-days was about the time between small corrections and it occurred like clockwork.

Further details on why I think the market is topping - here’s another one:

BREADTH
I measure breadth as percent of stocks advancing.  The 10-day moving average (10-dMA) of breadth continues to diverge from the S&P 500 and that is not a good sign for the markets.  Usually, when the 10-dMA drops below 50% advancing, the markets will decline…how far, remains to be seen. (Longer term measures of breadth are also declining.)

Today was unusual as far as breadth is concerned.  When the markets are going up, one would expect to see breadth for the day greater than 50%.  Today, declining stocks outpaced advancers according to Briefing.com.

CALLING THE TOP – ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD DO THAT!
There is no point in raising my guess on the top (start of the correction).  The primary reason for my belief that the S&P would retreat was that the S&P 500 was 9.9 percent above the 200-day Moving average.  That value was reached on 14 March.  The market stalled long enough to raise the 200-dMA.  Now it will have to reach 1580 before it is 10% above the 200-dMA and 1650 to be 15% above the 200-dMA. 

Of course, I wouldn’t be missing some gains if I had followed the NTSM analysis – it still hasn’t signaled a sell.  In the end though – every investor must be able to sleep at night and I was simply getting uncomfortable with advancing markets and conflicting signs. 

MARKET RECAP
Tuesday, the S&P 500 finished up 0.5% to 1570 (rounded). 

VIX fell 6% to 12.78.

NTSM
Tuesday, the NTSM analysis remained HOLD at the close.  The numerical analysis has not yet confirmed my “off-the-grid” top-call.

Sentiment is a sell; Price is a buy; and Volume and VIX are neutral…broken record.

MY INVESTED POSITION
I remain about 20% invested in stocks as of 5 March (S&P 500-1525), due to my risk tolerance rather than the numerical NTSM analysis.  To put it bluntly, I currently have no tolerance for risk.  (If I were strictly following the NTSM numbers, I'd still be heavily invested in stocks.) My reasoning may be found at…
http://navigatethestockmarket.blogspot.com/2013/03/why-i-got-mostly-out-of-stock-market.html