Monday, March 13, 2017

Hussman Funds Commentary … Raymond James Excerpt … Stock Price to Monetary Policy … Stock Market Analysis … Trading ETFs and ETF Ranking

JOHN HUSSMAN EXCERPT (Hussman Funds) “Presently, we observe the broadest market valuation extreme in history, with the steepest median valuations on record, and the most reliable capitalization-weighted measures within a few percent of their 2000 peaks. In addition to extreme valuations, bullish sentiment, and consumer confidence, market action has deteriorated in interest-sensitive sectors, and internal dispersion has been widening more broadly. As of Friday, more than one-third of stocks are already below their 200-day moving averages. Indeed, even with the major indices near record highs, more NYSE-traded issues set new 52-week lows last week than new highs, while credit spreads abruptly widened. All of these considerations have been remarkably useful in helping to identify points of risk and opportunity in prior market cycles, and …I’m convinced that these considerations are relevant here.” – John Hussman, PhD, Weekly Market Commentary at…
 
RAYMOND JAMES COMMENTARY (Raymond James)
Inside Jeffrey Saut’s weekly commentary we find the following:  “…the main and bigger move for equities remains higher given an economy that in general continues to improve and a Fed that remains net accommodative. But in the short term there are some divergences when we look at credit markets, breadth, and perhaps evidence of early rotation out of more cyclical groups into more defensive groups which suggests risk appetite may be waning a bit. The longer this divergence lasts as equities move higher the bigger the correction within the context of our current cyclical and secular bull market. Proceed cautiously for now.” - Mick St. Amour, ‎Investment Analyst at Merrill Lynch.
 
STOCK PRICE TO MONETARY POLICY (Jesse Felder Blog)
“…look at stock prices is in relation to monetary velocity…we see something totally unprecedented.” – Jesse Felder.
Chart and commentary at…
My cmt: Back in the old days, M2 Money Supply was thought to be a primary driver of inflation.  If there’s too much money chasing too few goods, voila, inflation.  Much of this M2 money must still be locked up in the banks.  The FED dumped tons of money on the banks to allow them to remain safely capitalized during the Housing/Financial crash. Felder’s Blog covers 3-charts that indicate massive over-valuation of stocks.
 
MARKET REPORT / ANALYSIS        
-Monday the S&P 500 was essentially unchanged at 2373.
-VIX fell about 3% to 11.35.
-The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 2.618% as Bonds remain under pressure in advance of an expected rate by the Fed.
 
Investors remains cautious and volume was low today, roughly 15% below the monthly average. The markets are likely to remain in a holding pattern until after the FED meeting ends on Wednesday.  A 25-basis point rate hike is almost certain and markets expect it. Anything else will be unsettling.  I am not sure that the market will like a small hike, but we’ll know in a few days.
 
Indicators are unsettled too. Money Trend remains pointing down and the SUM of 16-indicators was down to -7 Monday down from -1 Friday. There were some improvements in market internals, though, and advancing stocks outpaced decliners while up-volume was higher than down-volume Monday.
 
The Cyclical Industrial stocks (ETF, XLI) are underperforming the S&P 500 on almost every time frame.  That shows a high level of concern by investors.  Utilities continue to outperform the Index too.  This is another measure of dispersion within the market. I wouldn’t call this bearish yet, but it is a point of concern.
 
ETF RANKING SYSTEM RESULTS AS OF LAST FRIDAY
I began recommending ETFs based on their momentum on 29 November. Results below are from 29 Nov thru 10 March.
-Returns assuming 100% invested in the S&P 500 Index: 7.6%
-Results assuming 100% invested in the XLF, Top Ranked ETF: 11.6%
-Results assuming equally invested in all 3-top ranked ETFs: 4.7%
 
The top ranked ETF has outperformed the S&P 500 while other ETFs have not performed as well.  As noted in my discussions, momentum is not the same as return. A fund may have very good momentum, but then fail to keep up with the S&P 500 if its momentum falters. That was the case with Energy (XLE) and it sustained a nearly 4% loss since the end of November. XLE was the biggest loser in the Momentum System, but there were a few other small losses in shortly held trades.
 
If we look at a shorter time frame, the last 2-months, and consider only the 3-ETFs that are currently ranked in the top 3, the results follow:
S&P 500: 4.2%
XLF: 5.2%
ITA: 5.4%
XLK: 6.8%
The 3-funds ranked highest for momentum were also the 3-highest ranked ETFs for returns when compared to all 15-ETFs under consideration over the last 40-trading days.
 
My takeaway is that there is merit in the system, but it can be tripped up if one of the 3-top ranked ETFs loses momentum rapidly. Further, these results are not compounded so they are only approximates.
 
CURRENT RANKING OF 15 ETFs (Ranked Daily)
The top ranked ETF receives 100%. The rest are then ranked based on their momentum relative to the leading ETF.  While momentum isn’t stock performance per se, momentum is closely related to stock performance. For example, over the 4-months from Oct thru mid-February 2016, the number 1 ranked Financials (XLF) outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20%.
*For additional background on the ETF ranking system see NTSM Page at…
I would avoid iEAFE (Europe and Far East); currently its 120-dMA is declining.
Recommended ETF Portfolio of top 3:
1. Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF)
2. iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense (ITA)
3. Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)
XLI was slightly ahead of the XLK, but not enough to change the recommendation.  Further, if there is a correction, XLI is likely to be among the worst performers.
I have not yet established a position based on the ETF Ranking; I am waiting for a better entry point.
 
SHORT-TERM TRADING PORTFOLIO - 2017 (Small-% of the total portfolio)
Rydex 2x Short S&P 500 (RYTPX): Established 6 Dec.
2x Short S&P 500 (SDS): Established 16 Dec.
Long Volatility ETN (VXX): Established 6 Jan 2017.  
NET:
Now I wish I had tightened trading rules sooner. I am underwater again!
-“In a bull market, you can only be long or neutral.” – D. Gartman
-“The best policy is to avoid shorting unless a major bear market is underway and downside momentum has been thoroughly established. Even then, your timing must sometimes be perfect. In a bull market the trend is truly your friend, and trading against the grain is usually a fool's errand.” – Clif Droke.
 “There are two kinds of forecasters. Those who don’t know, and those who don’t know they don’t know.”- John Kenneth Galbraith.
 
MONDAY MARKET INTERNALS (NYSE DATA)
Market Internals remained Neutral on the market.
Market Internals are a decent trend-following analysis of current market action, but should not be used alone for short term trading. They are usually right, but they are often late.  They are most useful when they diverge from the Index.  In 2014, using these internals alone would have made a 9% return vs. 13% for the S&P 500 (in on Positive, out on Negative – no shorting). 
 
LONG TERM INDICATOR
Monday, Price was positive; Sentiment was negative (Bullishness is at an extreme.); Volume & VIX indicators were neutral.
MY INVESTED STOCK POSITION:
TSP (RETIREMENT ACCOUNT – GOV EMPLOYEES) ALLOCATION
I reduced stock allocation to 25% stocks in the S&P 500 Index fund (C-Fund) Wednesday, 1 March 2017 in my long-term accounts. Remainder is 75% G-Fund (Government securities). This is a conservative retiree allocation based mostly on short-term signals.