Monday, November 19, 2012

Sucker Rally? – Probably. (Just another Manic Monday)

MARKET RECAP                                                                               
Friday the S&P 500 was up a whopping 2% to 1387(rounded).  VIX fell about 7% to 1524.  

MANIC MONDAY (analysis by the Bangles)
Today’s close is on the upper trend line, so it doesn’t change my bearish opinion.  It was also a statistically significant day (based on the price and volume action and my daily statistical-analysis of the market).  Some will say the correction is over, but statistically significant days often occur at reversals and some actually use a strategy of buying after big down-days and selling after big up-days.  (“Big” means statistically significant.) I back tested this theory in the 2008-2009 bear market and found that it beat the market by several hundred percent using a 2X mutual fund.  Unfortunately, the strategy has been “discovered” and may not be valid at this point. (Don't even ask about the risk!)
 
IT’S NOT ALL ABOUT THE FISCAL CLIFF (from Comstock Partners)
While the fiscal cliff problem has absorbed almost all of the financial media comment since the election, there's a lot more to the stock market decline that has virtually gotten lost in the discussion…With the economy likely to soften at a time when fiscal policy is about to tighten, corporate earnings estimates coming down and Fed policy increasingly ineffectual, the factors that have sparked the stock market in the last few years have come to an end. In our view, this is readily apparent in the change in trend since the peak on September 14th. We think that date will turn out to be the top for some time to come.
http://www.comstockfunds.com/(X(1)S(4q2vaob1cjcsczv0mqkclkrt))/default.aspx?act=Newsletter.aspx&category=MarketCommentary&newsletterid=1681&menugroup=Home&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

BAD ECONOMIC NEWS – MAYBE IT’S ABOUT THIS! (from the Philly Fed)
“The Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti business conditions index is designed to track real business conditions at high frequency. Its underlying (seasonally adjusted) economic indicators (weekly initial jobless claims; monthly payroll employment, industrial production, personal income less transfer payments, manufacturing and trade sales; and quarterly real GDP) blend high- and low-frequency information and stock and flow data…the ADS index…(is) updated as data on the index's underlying components are released.”
 
 
Chart and discussion from…
http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/business-conditions-index/

This index is a primary tool for the Fed to gauge the US economy.  The index is now -0.75 and this is based on data prior to Sandy.  The last time the ADS index was -0.75 and falling was January 2008.  That was the Top before the start of the major bear market that eventually took the S&P 500 down more than 50%.  This could always reverse, but it is certainly cause for concern.

THE CHINA SYNDROME
(from the TR Price investors Report)
“China may be at a critical inflection point, marking…a sharp cyclical downturn…one in which annual growth may drop over time to as low as 5%, says Anh Lu, manager of the New Asia Fund…Lower growth in China has profound and far-flung implications for the world, Already troubled by Europe’s recession and sluggish U.S. growth.”

My cmt: 5% sounds like a GOOD number for growth, but there is a lot of skepticism of the growth numbers reported by China. 

NTSM
The NTSM analysis remained SELL Monday due to Price and Volume indicators.

MY INVESTED POSITION
Based on the SELL signal, 7 November 2012, I moved out of the stock market at 1377 on the S&P 500.  Because of the extreme negativity I have noted from Hussman and others, I am currently invested in a range of near 15% invested in stocks.  I also took short positions on the morning of the 8th that make me currently net short the S&P 500.  (I am using Guggenheim (formerly RYDEX) funds and 2x Short ETF, SDS.  Those are dangerously volatile so I don’t recommend them unless you have a BIG tolerance for risk.  Also, if they are held too long they may not perform well.

REPEATING STRATEGY
As I have noted before, others may choose to keep more invested in stocks without too much damage to their portfolio if the invested % is low.  For example, if one were to keep 30% invested in stocks and the market crashed by 50%, the loss to the portfolio would only be 15%.  If that is your plan, keep the low-beta stocks (those with lower P/E ratios) such as utilities, consumer staples, or value oriented mutual funds.  Sell technology.  Keeping 30% invested in stocks is actually a pretty good strategy since it hedges the bet if the market continues up after selling stocks.